🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Expensive

Based on recent research, typical households pays $27,000 annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements regarding tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you compare it to what the typical US resident spends. I know dozens of businesses who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that in comprehensive systems, those payments include retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs versus what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and company payments. Similar to much of our government's military, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would render administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, despite increased taxation required, would still be a better and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid current situation could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and agree that major reforms need to happen.